farla: (Default)
farla ([personal profile] farla) wrote2011-03-31 08:24 pm
Entry tags:

Hunger Games, Chapter Twelve

Last time on the childmurder games, eleven kids are killed and another girl is mutilated. Thank goodness Katniss was smart and tied herself to her sleeping tree so she stays in when startled!

I'm not kidding, the chapter honest to god starts with "Thank goodness".

Katniss gets a glimpse of Peeta.

His face is swollen with bruises, there’s a bloody bandage on one arm, and from the sound of his gait he’s limping somewhat.

Huh. Sounds like they might have beaten him up but left him alive for now to carry their stuff or whatever on the basis he's no danger, since I doubt he could really stop them from murdering him in that state.

I remember him shaking him his head, telling me not to go into the fight for the supplies, when all along, all along he’d planned to throw himself into the thick of things. 

Katniss, you don't know that. It's possible they got the jump on him later on and decided to keep him around because he's useful.

She then says she can forgive him going for the supplies, but...

 This teaming up with the Career wolf pack to hunt down the rest of us. No one from District 12 would think of doing such a thing! Career tributes are overly vicious, arrogant, better fed, but only because they’re the Capitol’s lapdogs.

Yes, because when I think "gets their kids murdered on a yearly basis" I sure think "lapdog".

Fuck you, Katniss. And fuck you too, Book, you're the one making her think this.

What happened to the idea the class divide between townspeople and coal miners was just another trick of the capital? Do you really think what those districts have is anything compared to the capital? I mean, for starters, in the capital they don't fucking murder your kids every year! And yes, it's murdering their kids. If this was one district whose kid usually won, and if things weren't set up with each district having to send two kids so they're always losing at least one kid to the games, I could at least understand why people would think this.

But there are three districts and even if one wins, that means five other "career" kids die. Every. Year.

And vicious? Why are they vicious just because you don't like them? Why would they be vicious instead of calculating? Vicious doesn't win you games. And I've yet to see any actual examples of arrogance. Katniss, was it arrogant of you to assume these kids were your main competition and write off the rest of the players? Then why is it arrogant for them to assume the other trained kids are their main competition?

Finally, are you seriously saying it's okay to hate people because they're better fed than you? Because you seemed fine with the ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE CAPITAL.

The fact someone got a few more mouthfuls of food than you did is not the issue here. It isn't right to hate them for it.

Universally, solidly hated by all but those from their own districts.

Everyone in this world is a horrible, horrible person.

Kids. Kids raised from birth with no choice in this, knowing that even if everything goes according to plan they have only a one in six chance of coming back alive. And the rest of you hate them for that, more than you hate the people who made them do it. Not only that, but you pull holier than thou shit because it's obviously so much better for the victim to be some starving kid who doesn't stand a chance.

So she's horrified that Peeta would work with them, because clearly that's a relevant priority here.

 And Peeta had the gall to talk to me about disgrace?

By the way, the girl who last chapter was screaming in agony is still there, still not dead. That's the girl Katniss was wishing death on, thinking about how she was going to kill. A decent person - even, honestly, a not so decent one - would be feeling horrible right now. Katniss has yet to actually think about it in any way.

Anyway, Peeta goes back to make sure the girl's dead/kill her if she isn't. Katniss thinks about how she hopes he's killed, and that she'll do it herself if she can.

When he leaves, the other kids talk about him behind his back. ([livejournal.com profile] ember_reignited mentioned in the comments earlier that the kids are being treated like this is high school. It's the only explanation for this wtfery here.) It's about if they should kill him or not. Turns out they want him around in part because they're hoping he can find Katniss, because clearly, Katniss is the only person who matters. They're thinking Katniss might have been dumb enough to fall for the love thing and show up. They also think she's an airhead, so again, not sure why they think it's such a big deal to find her.

But they don't know why Katniss has her eleven score (see, I said it was stupid to want a high score) meaning Peeta hasn't told them. Given he has no reason to tell them no matter what his motives, this isn't really news.

You know, this doesn't even make sense. Why would the trained kids fuck up so badly on their kill? The one redeeming feature, such as it is, of training the kids is that they'll kill cleanly, or at least relatively fast. I think this all just happened because the author wants an excuse for him to walk away so they can talk. Which only serves to make the book's complete lack of caring about the maimed and now murdered girl look even worse.

It's not even a good excuse. It would have worked fine to have them saying something along these lines to his face, because none of it's any real secret. It would be painfully easy to write this section with the kids saying this stuff to him and then maybe we'd see some real sign of this claimed viciousness and arrogance on their part.

But finally, the kids leave.

The minute I hit the ground, I’m guaranteed a close-up.
The audience will have been beside themselves, knowing I was in the tree, that I overheard the Careers talking, that I discovered Peeta was with them. Until I work out exactly how I want to play that, I’d better at least act on top of things. Not perplexed. Certainly not confused or frightened.
No, I need to look one step ahead of the game.
So as I slide out of the foliage and into the dawn light, I pause a second, giving the cameras time to lock on me. Then I cock my head slightly to the side and give a knowing smile.




So, to win the game she has to put survival over humanity and life over love. Well, looks like she's our winner for sure, then.

Anyway, she set snares last night and when she checks them she finds a rabbit in one.

In no time, I’ve cleaned and gutted the animal, leaving the head, feet, tail, skin, and innards, under a pile of leaves.

I swear, the author's only research for this was looking at one page on field dressing.

Katniss. Let me list off parts of a rabbit you can't eat:







Got that?

As for parts of a rabbit you shouldn't eat unless you can cook it well, that's the intestines. Not the "innards". Whoever told you it's a bad idea to eat liver was playing a very cruel prank on you.. The brain, tongue, eyes, heart, etc are all also perfectly edible. JFC no wonder you were starving all the time, you don't have any idea what you're doing.

And what the hell, why are you cutting off the feet? Even assuming you can't get some scraps of meat off, what does it even matter? WHY ARE YOU WASTING TIME DOING THIS?

Finally, and perhaps more importantly - you're an idiot for skinning it. You haven't had any water for a day. You cook the meat in the skin to keep as much of the juice in as possible. Even assuming Katniss has never needed to do this for reasons of water, you get far more calories than if you let all the fat run off into the fire.

The point of field dressing is to preserve the raw meat as long as possible and make it easier to carry. Emptying out the internal cavity is done so the body cools faster, not because the lungs aren't perfectly edible. If you're going to eat it raw, you don't bother, and if you're going to cook it, again, you don't bother.

I’m wishing for a fire — eating raw rabbit can give you rabbit fever, a lesson I learned the hard way

Rabbit fever is actually carried by a wide variety of animals. You can get it by breathing in blood or handling infected meat, as well as by drinking water contaminated by rabbit feces. Those sparkling mountain streams Katniss claims she normally drinks from? Full of rabbit shit. It's also spread by ticks.(Incidentally, checking the liver would tell you if the rabbit was infected. Add this to the list of reasons you shouldn't throw it out immediately.)

She remembers the dead girl's fire and heads back to cook the meat. Since she has no way to wash her hands, that's not going to do much to her chances of getting rabbit fever.

Incidentally, rabbit fever usually has an incubation period of three to five days, up to fourteen at most, and I'd personally assume her immune system is pretty tough since she's likely eaten bad or infected food often. Considering she's going to be dead in a day or two from lack of water and is already easier prey from her dehydration, she should really just eat the meat raw.

I’m glad for the cameras now. I want sponsors to see I can hunt, that I’m a good bet because I won’t be lured into traps as easily as the others will by hunger

I really wish there was some real explanation of how sponsoring works. It seems to be tied to betting, which would imply people help to keep their bet alive, but then in turn imply that people would want to spend the minimum amount of money to get the maximum return. So showing off how self-sufficient you are might just mean people don't bother to give you money for stuff.

Also, if this is a regular thing - seriously, why aren't they eating each other? Katniss obviously doesn't have rabbit fever yet. Most problems with cannibalism are in the long term. In the short term, it's an awesome idea because it's a lot easier for us to tell if another person looks sick before we eat them.

 I try and think of everything I know about finding water. It runs downhill, so, in fact, continuing down into this valley isn’t a bad thing.

Well. It only took you a day to remember that. Still, I suppose it's something.

She finds some berries that resemble blueberries, but she doesn't recognize them exactly.

So, one of the things I learned about blueberries is that you know that weird rough bit on the end, where the flowers attach? All berries that have that are edible. See how much more useful that is to know than simply trying to memorize plants? There are actually a wide variety of rules you can use to guess if something's safe to eat.

I’m guessing this is some evil trick on the part of the Gamemakers. 

Paranoid much? This is the childmurder games, they don't want you to just eat the wrong thing and die. That's boring.

the plant instructor in the Training Center made a point of telling us to avoid berries unless you were 100 percent sure they weren’t toxic. 

No, that's mushrooms.

See, the thing about mushrooms is that mushrooms don't give a fuck about you. Recent genetic checks have shown that mushroom shape and composition have nothing to do with species relatedness, so you can't use any sort of system for which kind are generally safe. Color, shape, texture and smell are often random. There are a couple species that do deliberately interact with us above-ground creatures, but for the most part, what's in a mushroom is a random fungal cocktail. It's why so many are hallucinogenic when that's not actually a valid way to get people to stop eating you.

Furthermore - Katniss keeps acting like a first-world kid. If you happen to be wandering in the forest, yes, by all means don't eat the random berries, and don't eat the raw rabbit either. But right now she's on her second day with no water and heavy exertion. She is going to drop dead quite soon, and sooner if anyone else comes across her because she can't possibly fight back like this. If choice is "possibly poisonous berry" vs "definitely dying of dehydration", eat the fucking berries. If there was some other cue, like a bitter smell when she broke it open or that she did taste it and it tasted bad, then this would make a bit more sense. Plus again, just throw your knife at one of those rabbits and drink the blood if you're so worried the berries are poisonous. Even if you get rabbit fever three days from now, that's three more days of not being dead. Rabbit fever isn't even that dangerous, especially compared to the 100% mortality of dehydration.

She doesn't find any water by nightfall. The next morning, she's a mess. It occurs to her that if she did get sponsors, Haymitch can send her water.

You know, given Katniss is supposed to be super awesome at the whole surviving thing, I can't imagine the other people are doing that much better. She guesses the trained kids are getting their water from the lake, but the rest of the kids are presumably hiding like Katniss. And watching kids collapse and die of dehydration doesn't seem much more interesting than watching them freeze. Even if Katniss gets water in time, she's just spent two days just wandering around not killing people, because she had to put looking for water as her highest priority.

If the point of this is to make them kill each other, you should put out enough supplies they won't be so distracted.

But no water is forthcoming. Katniss is shocked. She "knows" Haymitch hates her (cry more, emo kid) but didn't think he'd let her die. Abusing the tributes is bad.

 Even Haymitch wouldn’t risk that, would he?

Well, you're the one who's been watching the Hunger Games for years. You tell me, how does it usually go?

This is a really common issue in worlds where there's some unusual setup that the characters should be familiar with but readers aren't. We have never seen how Haymitch handled the decade or two of tributes he'd had, but Katniss should have. She could be thinking now back to all the years kids didn't get sent any help and wondering if it wasn't that they had no sponsors, as she'd assumed, but because Haymitch refused to send anything.

So she wonders a bit more but she doesn't really believe it.

He has, in fact, in his own unpleasant way, genuinely been trying to prepare me for this. 

That's a pretty good look at it. Katniss/the narration at large has generally been terrible at reacting to people sanely (Effie is EVUL, Cinna is THE MOST WONDERFULEST) but it's been okay with Haymitch as long as we accept that, within the confines of this world, rampant alcoholism is classed as an indulgence and not a sign of a disorder.

But she wonders if it's a message. And she figures it out - if he's not sending water when she's going to die in a few hours, she must be within a few hours walk of water.

That's...well, a pretty amazing leap of faith.

Here's an idea: instead of getting an empty water bottle, Katniss just had the dry food and supplies. She gets this far and asks for water. Haymitch sends something, but it's empty.

That is a message. He'd be conserving money in a way that's ridiculous if there isn't any water around, but quite practical if there is.

So Katniss walks. And walks. And collapses.

My fingertips make small swirling patterns in the cool, slippery earth. 

And she realizes it's mud. Wow, that was convenient as fuck. Fall down a few feet earlier and she'd have just died.

So she crawls to water. Well aren't we picky. Mud has water in it too, you know. For all you know you were just at a low point in the water table and there was no pond.

I get out my flask and fill it with water. I add what I remember to be the right number of drops of iodine for purifying it. The half an hour of waiting is agony, but I do it. 

...you know, you can just drink the iodine straight off. It's not the best idea, but if you're too fucked up to stand you really don't want to wait another half hour for water. This is honestly kind of like tension whiplash - she's been going on and on about how she's in pain and desperate and dying, but she's still acting completely rationally. She should guzzle water, then remember the iodine and drink some in the hopes that'll even it out.

Anyway, turns out no one at all died today. The only death yesterday was the one girl. So this really seems a bad setup - other kids probably did the same thing as Katniss and spread out looking for water, so they're hard to find. They might even be out of reach of the other kids, who can only go so far before they'll return to the lake to refill their water bottles.

By the time the anthem plays, I feel remarkably better. There are no faces tonight, no tributes died today. Tomorrow I’ll stay here, resting, camouflaging my backpack with mud, catching some of those little fish I saw as I sipped, digging up the roots of the pond lilies to make a nice meal.

This is what's known as a hope spot. Despite seeing it a lot, I tend to keep falling for them because the direction of the story they suggest tends to be a more interesting one. Katniss has been terribly reactive so far. Giving her a chance to get on her feet would be nice. What does she do once she's safely camouflaged and well fed? Does she go on the offensive? If she does, is she going after people she feels "deserve" it, or anyone? Or, with food in her belly and distance from the other kids, will she realize she's been panicking and consider a different course of action.

A few hours later, the stampede of feet shakes me from slumber.

Turns out the gamemakers have finally decided that watching kids stumble around for water is boring, so they've lit a fire.

It's dramatic and all, but all I can think is how lucky Katniss is they didn't do it a little while earlier. The whole sequence is just too drawn out. If they're bored enough for such drastic measures, they shouldn't have put the only alternative source of water three day's walk away from the starting point in the first place.

Unless possibly the saga of Katniss has been interesting enough they felt like holding off on the fire. Which actually it might be given they seem to have lit it right next to her when they finally did, but it still seems like a massive overreaction when Katniss was presumably going to get up tomorrow and go find people to murder. People who sat through her walking for hours don't seem like the type to demand lighting everything on fire, you know?

But I'll give the majority of the chapter a pass. Most of it has detail issues (no really, drink the blood) but as I said back at the beginning, the overall structure of the story is good, you just have to be willing to go along with the narrative's claims various actions are the best thing to do. (Which interestingly, seem to display a marked unwillingness to make Katniss do anything gross. It occurs to me she hasn't tried to eat any bugs either.)

The opening, though? No. That's utterly fucked up.

[identity profile] actonthat.livejournal.com 2011-04-01 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
I've figured out what the books needs to do: Go Truman-Show-esque, and the reason the whole world is revolving around Katniss is because it is, and she was randomly selected to be put on or something, and the games really are about watching *her*.

Otherwise, you're being a lot more generous in your over-all view than I would be. The idea is interesting, but I think the setup is terrible and nonsensical, and that kills everything else for me; once the plot becomes ridiculous so fast, it all devolves into an MST for me.

[identity profile] farla.livejournal.com 2011-04-01 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, it's not quite at that level yet. A lot of the world revolving around Katniss stuff can be explained as her viewpoint alone. The kids hunting her makes little sense generally, but if we assume teaming up at all is sane, they're either trying to get her while they're still in a group or looking to ally with her - both, maybe.

This has kind of turned into a MST, come to think of it. Bear in mind, though, there's often paragraphs of unobjectionable stuff sandwiched between what I'm picking out.

[identity profile] purplekitte.livejournal.com 2011-04-02 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
It occurs to me to wonder just how big the arena is. If she was walk for two days in a random direction through the woods, that implies an area big enough that no way is anyone going to run into anyone else accidentally in any time span less than weeks. Hide and seek with that much space and cover doesn't work.

[identity profile] farla.livejournal.com 2011-04-03 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
By implication, I think there isn't much cover. But that just raises further questions, like how this is supposed to work, because without cover the nonviolent kids will just keep running away every time they see someone on the horizon.

(Anonymous) 2011-04-03 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
Your comments are really making me dislike the book more, but at least the opinions are honest. Plus, I'm learning survival skills in case I ever get stuck in the wilderness! I'll be living on pine bark, rabbit blood, plus berries with flowering parts!!!

But seriously, I'm learning some decent info that should rove handy in some way. I'm very curious to see what you say about the numerous plot holes that pop up in the next books. Along with future chapters.

[identity profile] farla.livejournal.com 2011-04-03 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
^_^ Bushcraft can be quite interesting.

Posted by "Not completely anonymous." My name is Li-Li, which is a better name than Peeta, at least

(Anonymous) 2011-10-26 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, I've been reading all your posts from the beginning. I'm really impressed by the level of research you've done. I read all three books in a hurry because the quality of writing was complete crap. I didn't pay attention to many details; I overlooked a bunch of stuff, things you've pointed out that are completely illogical. I hated the books anyway and the protagonist is a cold-blooded, selfish, annoying bitch, but your commentary made me realize just how ridiculous the trilogy is.

I'm having a hard time understanding how tripe like this managed to get published, when so many talented authors struggle and get rejected. I heard Collins also works/worked as a screenwriter and is adapting the book for screen herself. Collins is clearly a moron and is devoid of any writing skills. I mean gosh, even Stephenie fucking Meyer can write a grammatically correct sentence, at least. If the project meant that much to her, Collins should have just written The Hunger Games as a screenplay to begin with, since she is either too lazy or incapable of doing anything resembling real research. That way she could've left the survival skills details to technical advisors or whatever they're called. Of course that doesn't even begin to fix any of the other numerous problems, but still. Instead of just rage quitting like I wanted to do throughout, I stuck with it and read all three books because I hate to leave anything unfinished.

I know this has been mentioned in your earlier postings, but I just couldn't deal with the names. I laughed so hard at Peeta I thought I'd spontaneously combust. And Gale is a girls' name. Then I kept expecting a kid to show up with a name like fucking GlowWorm.

I can't remember which book it was in now (and the idea of opening any of those books ever again leaves me cold so I'm never gonna check) but there's one point in which Katniss and a sidekick guy (I think it's Peeta) are fighting back to back, monsters are coming at them from all sides. She runs out of arrows. He has the quiver strapped to his back. So instead of doing the common sense thing, they both leave themselves vulnerable by getting him to struggle to take off the straps and pass the whole thing to her. Um, I know nothing about archery and real fighting, but why wouldn't you just grab an arrow out of the quiver, leaving it strapped to him? It's the middle of a freaking battle, he's standing inches away, with his back to her, it doesn't require much more effort to reach out and grab an arrow from his back. Seriously, when I read that part I wanted to throw the book across the room, except it was on my Kindle. I guess at least my book was a free copy, BUT STILL, I'LL NEVER GET BACK THOSE HOURS OF MY LIFE THAT I LOST READING THIS CRAP. Well, at best the books could function as a How Not To manual for all aspiring writers.

The most disturbing thing I've heard about these books? They are actually on school reading lists, as if they're quality literature or something. When I heard that I thought there really is no hope for humanity. Truthfully your postings here should be required reading for anyone who's read the trilogy. Your site could act like a deprogramming thing of sorts, you know, to help rebuild one's sanity.

Re: Posted by "Not completely anonymous." My name is Li-Li, which is a better name than Peeta, at le

[identity profile] farla.livejournal.com 2011-10-26 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, you answer your own question there! It got published because most people don't notice any problem and think it's good enough to stick on school reading lists.

And you're too optimistic. If anything, research fail is way more common in movies. Why bother paying anyone ten bucks to fact check if the movie will still sell? I'm actually looking forward to the theatrical release because I'm curious if they bothered fixing up anything at all.

Re: Posted by "Not completely anonymous." My name is Li-Li, which is a better name than Peeta, at le

(Anonymous) 2011-10-27 01:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Lol that's true I did XD Setting aside all the factual inaccuracies though, it's disturbing that something so poorly-written and riddled with grammatical errors got published. Collins seems to struggle with basic English. Those weird, jerky sentences were just bizarre.

Btw your critiques here have inspired me to write a parody Twilight/Hunger Games fanfic (my first ever) I plan to put the first part up on FFN soon.

Re: Posted by "Not completely anonymous." My name is Li-Li, which is a better name than Peeta, at le

(Anonymous) 2011-11-23 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
The book you're referencing would be Catching Fire and it was Peeta. I had to read and analyze both HG and CF in 8th grade... -_- Fortunately, I was simple-minded then and couldn't tell the difference between Tolkien good and plotless romance and now I'm better at that kind of thing! ^_^' Though not by much...

Re: Posted by "Not completely anonymous." My name is Li-Li, which is a better name than Peeta, at le

[identity profile] lurkeriatipsos.livejournal.com 2011-12-11 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
I mean gosh, even Stephenie fucking Meyer can write a grammatically correct sentence, at least.

brb loling forever

(Anonymous) 2012-01-04 03:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Just a point on the names "Peeta" and "Gale".

1) Peeta is in fact an actual name in some cultures (although more typically a girls' name), which seems to be related to the common enough name "Peter" (meaning 'rock', which is actually what the name "Peeta" is generally agreed to mean). The name has also commonly been noted by fans of THG to be similar to "Pita", as in the type of bread--Peeta's family being the bakers, obviously. Considering that over the course of the first book, Katniss starts to rely on Peeta as an emotional 'rock', the name could actually be seen as relating to this as well, apparently with more subtlty than you'd expect given the way people tend to research these things when they're interested.

http://www.babynology.com/meaning-peeta-f6.html
http://www.babynames.com/name/PEETA

2) Gale is a gender-neutral name. In other words, it is jut as much a boys' name as a girls' name. It is actually a fairy popular boys' name, in fact.

http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/1/Gale
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gale_(given_name)

Before you laugh at how ridiculous names might sound to you, consider for a moment that, in the English language, "Li-Li" would be considered a ridiculous name for many people (unless it is from an area which uses it as a nickname for Elizabeth, which it has been used for), but not so in other languages, and not so to people who are used to people from other cultures and different naming conventions. I would have expected somebody with a non-English name, speaking in English, might actually be more aware of the differences in names by culture.
(Personally, I actually think that Li-Li is a lovely name, but I actually have an interest in names and their origins and meanings).

As for "The Hunger Games", I've read the first book and have decided to reserve my personal judgement on them as a whole until I've read the trilogy. However, one thing that hasn't bothered me so far is the names, and to be honest I actually find it somewhat exasperating the kinds of complaints being made.

Different Districts and the Capitol have different naming conventions, and while some of the names might be unusual, culturally they seem to make a vague sense that I can buy into, when one considers that the series' is said to be set centuries in the future (today, names like Godfried or Isoude are just about never given, so some changes are normal).

Meanwhile, some of the names are understandable in terms of the character of the parents, or at least what can be gathered from them. An apothecary and her poucher husband name their daughters Katniss and Primrose, both edible plants. Considering the fact that plenty of parents give their children names with personal significance, this is perfectly plausible and, depending on culture, realistic.

Common rue, the plant, has both medicinal properties and has been used (and still is, in some cultures) as an ingredient in food and as a herb, though generally not in large quantities, and is also easily enough grown in hot or dry soil. Since the character of Rue comes from the aggricultural District 11, a district where the population receives the bare minimum to eat, naming your child after a plant which could be fairly useful to a poor family is understandable. (Obviously "Rue" can also mean "regret", but this is almost certainly thematic). Thresh is also a farming term, so there seems to be some sort of a theme in terms of naming.

Whether it's a good thing or a bad thing, a lot of authors put an awful lot of thought into the names they give their characters, especially in fantasy, science fiction, or speculative fiction. So before dismissing a fictional character's name as ridiculous, do some basic google searches or use some common sense (eg names in different languages tend to sound odd in unrelated languages). It can actually give you some insight into what the author may have been thinking.

[identity profile] farla.livejournal.com 2012-01-04 05:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Peeta is in fact an actual name in some cultures (although more typically a girls' name)

The reason we're complaining about the names is not that this collection of syllables is impossible for any human to ever give a kid. It's that it makes no sense as an extrapolation from current American society, which is supposedly where these people come from. Not only is Peeta not a name in most cultures, not only in those cultures is it not a boy's name, but specifically, it is not a name in modern America and in modern America -a endings are very strongly used to indicate a female name, so how would we get from Peter to Peeta? Moreover, why are names like Peter, which have existed in society for so long, simply missing?

Whether it's a good thing or a bad thing, a lot of authors put an awful lot of thought into the names they give their characters, especially in fantasy, science fiction, or speculative fiction. So before dismissing a fictional character's name as ridiculous, do some basic google searches or use some common sense (eg names in different languages tend to sound odd in unrelated languages). It can actually give you some insight into what the author may have been thinking.

I don't think you have any idea what the problem is. If anything, thinking too much about names tends to be the problem. In Peeta's case, the author was almost certainly trying to make a Peter reference but also wanted to make it sound like pita bread because lol baker. If she'd just named him Peter or used one of the numerous existing variants of the name found in America, or even looked at how names change over time and extrapolated from that, it wouldn't be such a terrible name, but being clever and symbolic sadly won out.

And again, this is taking place in America. If everyone had Russian names, the fact they're normal Russian names wouldn't change the fact they don't make sense for what future distopian America would be naming their kids. Names are supposed to sound like they fit the culture. These ones don't. It doesn't matter if they're perfectly appropriate to whatever culture she snagged them from. Zebras exist perfectly appropriately in Africa but if they showed up in the forests here it'd need a damn good explanation for how it happened.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-05 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
Except it is no longer America, it is the District cultures and Panem as a whole, and there is no evidence that other cultures had joined in with each other in order to create Panem. We have been told that it has been centuries since whatever the disarster was that lead to Panem. Cultures change. A few hundred years ago and "American culture" would mean Native Americans.

So no, the argument that the story is taking place in "America" does not hold much weight. It is taking place in the fictious country of Panem, in the continent of North America.

[identity profile] farla.livejournal.com 2012-01-05 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
Cultures change. A few hundred years ago and "American culture" would mean Native Americans.

...what the hell. Native American culture didn't "change" into modern American culture, Native Americans were wiped out and replaced by Europeans who brought their existing culture and names over. Peter is a name that's far older than a few hundred years.

Unless another country wiped out modern Americans before moving onto the continent your reasoning is nonsense, and even then there's the problem that there's no existing culture on the planet that fits with the names we're given.

So no, the argument that the story is taking place in "America" does not hold much weight.

If it's not supposed to be taking place in America, then the author wouldn't have said it takes place in America. Since she instead made a big point of how it's America, you can't excuse it by saying that it must not be related to America at all.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-05 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
So saying that District 12 was around an area once known as Appalachia & that the Capitol is in an area once called the Rockies cannot possibly be used as a means of 'telling' us about what the geographic, climatic, or ecological features of these places are supposed to be, instead of 'showing' them? Especially as it wasn't a "big point", it was a couple of throwaway lines in the middle of an early chapter which then stopped being referenced.

& yes, the culture of North America did indeed change FROM being those of the Native Americans TO being the cultures of the various European groups that wiped them out, BECAUSE THEY WIPED THEM OUT.

The word "change" does not denote exactly how the change occured or how the previous situation relates to the new one. Since I'm guessing that wasn't obvious & that my meaning got muddled, I'm going to try to explain what I meant using a metaphor (in the hopes that I'll be able to do so without insulting, angering, offending, or annoying anybody).

So, here the bowl is the area of land, the grapes are people (since people are people & grapes are grapes), & the different kinds of grapes are different cultures (Since their different enough to be distinuished, but no enough to make them no longer part of the same collective whole).

If you have a bowl of dark grapes which you leave in the right hot, dry conditions, eventually the contents of that bowl will CHANGE into raisins. One way the culture of an area can change is by slowly changing form naturally over time.

However, if you were to remove those dark grapes from the bowl & replace them with large green grapes, then the contents of that bowl have CHANGED to a completely different type of grape. One way the culture of an area can change is because it has been replaced by another culture taking over, such as in the case of the Native Americans. Which is really rather depressing, but it's still a form of change.

If these new green grapes are left in the new environment that is the bowl in the hot, dry place, then eventually these grapes will CHANGE into sultanas, similar to the first example with the dark grapes. (Apparently not all countries distinguish between raisins & sultanas, but it's what I'm used to, & I & some other people I know can tell them apart based on appearance, flavour, etc, usually, unless they're all mixed together.)

Which brings me to...:

If you have the bowl in the appropriate hot, dry place with the dark grapes in them, & then you take some of those dark grapes out & replace them with green grapes, then the contents of the bowl have CHANGED into something new: a mixture of both. This is like when different groups of immigrants move into an area & live there with those who originally lived there, allowing room for 2-way migration.

If you then leave this bowl filled with dark grapes & green grapes for long enough in the right conditions, then eventually the contents of the bowl will CHANGE into a mix of raisins & sultanas, which are generally indistinguishable when mixed together. Similar to how a country with multiple cultures mixing within it will likely over time develop a more unified culure across them (the raisins & sultanas might be here be considered sub-cultures, if that helps at all). I'll admit that this is the senario that I'm most familiar with, here in New Zealand, since this is much closer to the kind of culture that I grew up with.

When I said that the culture in THG had changed from American to those of Panem, I was thinking more along the lines of the final bowl of raisins/sultanas: different peopple had mixed together in the area, which under certain circumstances lead to the culture & people of Panem. The contents of the bowl CHANGED. The culture CHANGED. The continent once known as North America no longer holds the countries nor the cultures of the U.S.A. & Canada, but the country & culture/s of Panem.

& with the cultures, the names can change too, over time. We don't know that "Peter" isn't used as a name any more, just that the name "Peeta" has been used. That doesn't that the name can't be there. Since plenty of other languages include male names that end in vowels, including a, could any of them have started a tradition for "Peeta" as a boys name?

(Anonymous) 2012-03-25 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
^ is a good case of "if you can't win with reason, win with volume."

(Anonymous) 2012-01-01 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
So, this is incredibly late to ask, I think, but are you going to go through this with Mockingjay, as well?

Because, oh, how I would love to see your commentary for that.

[identity profile] farla.livejournal.com 2012-01-01 06:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I did! http://dragon-quill.blogspot.com/2011_08_01_archive.html

(Anonymous) 2012-01-03 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
YOU ARE EVERYTHING THAT IS WONDERFUL.

(Anonymous) 2012-02-02 08:38 am (UTC)(link)
I am willing to give Katniss sort of a pass on her failure to drink blood, eat bugs, etc. She thinks she's Ms. Survival In The Woods, but she's basically a hobbyist game hunter, and it doesn't sound as though they've been given any particularly detailed or sophisticated survival training. Yes, she talks about starvation, but as you've pointed out a number of times, this is not actually a famine scenario by any means.

She may not exactly be a city kid, but she simply doesn't know enough to be a very effective survivalist.

As for the rest of it...dang, my instinct not to read these books is being richly rewarded.

(Anonymous) 2012-03-11 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Just out of interest- do we know how the hell she timed a half hour?

(Anonymous) 2012-03-25 05:52 am (UTC)(link)
She could 'feel' it. Or she's guessing. Or the writer has her head up her arse.

(Anonymous) 2012-03-25 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
Just out of interest, after you said there are no short term effects of Cannibalism, what are the long term effects of Cannibalism? Aside from the fact that people would sop talking to you and you'd be a social pariah of course.

[identity profile] farla.livejournal.com 2012-03-25 01:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, the dramatic example is kuru (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuru_(disease)) and really any of the nasty prion diseases that turn your brain into swiss cheese. More generally, cannibalism is just a good way to contact various diseases and parasites because we're the same species.

Very few of these will kick in within a month, though, which is how long the games last. You can avoid anyone obviously sick, so any diseases you'd get are the slow burn ones. You could end up with AIDS, but you won't get the flu.

(Anonymous) 2012-03-27 10:45 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, Prions? That thing that science can't really explain? Aren't they just protein that's gone bad somehow? Sure, I'm basing this on this cracked.com article (http://www.cracked.com/article_18508_6-terrifying-diseases-that-science-cant-explain_p2.html), but surely the point is still valid. I do see your point though. Shame cannibalism was a no-go topic in this book due to the "that's so Icky!!!!" factor that Collins seems to follow devoutly. Would have been interesting to see!

And after watching the film I'm rereading your series and realize just how humorous, awesome and analytical it is. Thanks for such a thorough and mocking review (: