![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Pokesercution
Dec. 19th, 2008 05:03 pmContinuing our examination of why pokephiles can't have nice things (because just NaRe is tiresome), there's Sin, by that person who told people to flame me because they were outraged I didn't reply to their review so there'll probably be explosions shortly.
Anyway.
The story can be summed up in the word "fursecution". It's all about how the noble pokephiles with their pure love for their pokemon got exterminated by the evil religious prudes, and now it's a hundred years later and presumably the banner of pokephilia will be taken up again.
The author states at the beginning of the story they don't know or care about religion or history, nor about how broken arms work. But that's okay! It's just the entire subject matter of their story.
We go on to learn that the great purge involved killing six million innocent pokephiles and dear god do I hope that number wasn't intentional.
Then we get a brief history on pokemon fucking.
Basically, a huge subset of the population is fucking their pokemon. No, there's no explanation why. It's just assumed that if there were pokemon, everyone would want to fuck them. In fact, pokemon fucking is so popular there are pokemon brothels all over the place for people who aren't the noble pokephiles and just want it to be all about sex. (Considering the world is in the rest of the story divided between noble pokephiles and those who think sex with pokemon is wrong, it's unclear who was going to these brothels.) Anyway, the brothel-runners (not the noble pokephiles!) are abusive and evil and feature such things as pokemon being raped to death. So the pokemon rights people start saying pokephilia is wrong! But they just don't understand the noble pokephiles and how it's not about sex, man, it's about free love, they have a deep connection as well as the papers designating their legal ownership of the pokemon so back off, okay?
"Pokemon-rights groups spoke out, saying Pokephilia was abuse toward pokemon. Pokephiles, the ones who were with their Pokemon through love, spoke out about how Pokephilia should be. How the two could be in love, and how pokemon weren’t just used for sex."
No, the next line does not give the pokemon's opinion. That's the end of it. The noble pokephile does not suggest treating their partner who they're in love with as an equal and letting them make their own decision. Nor do the noble pokephiles care about the whole rape-to-death thing until it means they get unfairly persecuted for their own pokemon fucking, at which point they start insisting they're totally different, stop persecuting me!
Meanwhile pokemon are still getting raped to death, but why should the pokephiles care? They're being persecuted here!
So in sum, pokephiles = NAMBLA*, if the people of NAMBLA could legally own the kids they were fucking and kill them if they felt like it. Not creepy at all!
At this point, apparently because of pokemon-rights groups, the government starts to take action. They stop giving hybrids the same rights as humans (why hybrids had the same rights as humans in the first place is unexplained, given that they're half a group that seems to have fewer legal rights than your average chicken). And they annul all marriages (again, why there was legal marriage in the first place is not explained, and no, there's no mention of any other types of marriage than totally heterosexual ones. By god, marriage is meant to be between one girl and one male pikachu you sick freaks!)...
...and then they suddenly decide to kill everyone.
Because as we all know, social service's standard way of dealing with incest is to hunt the family down, kill the guy, then kill the daughter he raped and the little kid she gave birth to. So logically, if pokemon rights groups oppose pokephila because they think it's abusive, they will institute a mass slaughter of all the pokemon involved.
Nor is it like we have hundreds of hundreds of years in human history detailing many times when human society gets repressive and crazy, and have a pretty good blueprint for how it should work. And of course if all they were doing was stuff like taking the pokemon away, it wouldn't get the message across, because apparently the pokemon weren't actually in a mutual relationship and the only way to express the persecution is by killing your property along with you.
Disturbing infodump over, we return to our pokephile in training. She's feeding scraps to stray pokemon, because it helps the pokephile's case so much that they keep treating their beloved pokemon like they have the same ability to give consent as a pet cat. Then she runs into a talking psychic type, and it just gets worse, because now it's confirmed that they do have human cognition and are capable of talking and understanding, it's just that no one, including the pokephiles fucking them, cares. She goes on to feed him pidgey soup.
Yeah.
*Today's question, if you are able to ponder it: do you think members of the North American Man/Boy Love Association think it's wrong, sick and immoral for men to have sex with underage girls?
Oh, and a bonus review from Mightyena26:
Oh, wow, that's a really good question. I'll be awake half the night because
of this. LOL. The writing style wasn't the greatest, but I still enjoyed
reading it because of the interesting question. Pokemon names should always be
capatalized, just so you know. Such as Eevee, Vaporeon, Jolteon, Flareon,
Espeon, Umbreon, Leafeon, and Glaceon. It was okay, not the greatest thing
I've ever read. But the question is just mind-bogging.
Anyway.
The story can be summed up in the word "fursecution". It's all about how the noble pokephiles with their pure love for their pokemon got exterminated by the evil religious prudes, and now it's a hundred years later and presumably the banner of pokephilia will be taken up again.
The author states at the beginning of the story they don't know or care about religion or history, nor about how broken arms work. But that's okay! It's just the entire subject matter of their story.
We go on to learn that the great purge involved killing six million innocent pokephiles and dear god do I hope that number wasn't intentional.
Then we get a brief history on pokemon fucking.
Basically, a huge subset of the population is fucking their pokemon. No, there's no explanation why. It's just assumed that if there were pokemon, everyone would want to fuck them. In fact, pokemon fucking is so popular there are pokemon brothels all over the place for people who aren't the noble pokephiles and just want it to be all about sex. (Considering the world is in the rest of the story divided between noble pokephiles and those who think sex with pokemon is wrong, it's unclear who was going to these brothels.) Anyway, the brothel-runners (not the noble pokephiles!) are abusive and evil and feature such things as pokemon being raped to death. So the pokemon rights people start saying pokephilia is wrong! But they just don't understand the noble pokephiles and how it's not about sex, man, it's about free love, they have a deep connection as well as the papers designating their legal ownership of the pokemon so back off, okay?
"Pokemon-rights groups spoke out, saying Pokephilia was abuse toward pokemon. Pokephiles, the ones who were with their Pokemon through love, spoke out about how Pokephilia should be. How the two could be in love, and how pokemon weren’t just used for sex."
No, the next line does not give the pokemon's opinion. That's the end of it. The noble pokephile does not suggest treating their partner who they're in love with as an equal and letting them make their own decision. Nor do the noble pokephiles care about the whole rape-to-death thing until it means they get unfairly persecuted for their own pokemon fucking, at which point they start insisting they're totally different, stop persecuting me!
Meanwhile pokemon are still getting raped to death, but why should the pokephiles care? They're being persecuted here!
So in sum, pokephiles = NAMBLA*, if the people of NAMBLA could legally own the kids they were fucking and kill them if they felt like it. Not creepy at all!
At this point, apparently because of pokemon-rights groups, the government starts to take action. They stop giving hybrids the same rights as humans (why hybrids had the same rights as humans in the first place is unexplained, given that they're half a group that seems to have fewer legal rights than your average chicken). And they annul all marriages (again, why there was legal marriage in the first place is not explained, and no, there's no mention of any other types of marriage than totally heterosexual ones. By god, marriage is meant to be between one girl and one male pikachu you sick freaks!)...
...and then they suddenly decide to kill everyone.
Because as we all know, social service's standard way of dealing with incest is to hunt the family down, kill the guy, then kill the daughter he raped and the little kid she gave birth to. So logically, if pokemon rights groups oppose pokephila because they think it's abusive, they will institute a mass slaughter of all the pokemon involved.
Nor is it like we have hundreds of hundreds of years in human history detailing many times when human society gets repressive and crazy, and have a pretty good blueprint for how it should work. And of course if all they were doing was stuff like taking the pokemon away, it wouldn't get the message across, because apparently the pokemon weren't actually in a mutual relationship and the only way to express the persecution is by killing your property along with you.
Disturbing infodump over, we return to our pokephile in training. She's feeding scraps to stray pokemon, because it helps the pokephile's case so much that they keep treating their beloved pokemon like they have the same ability to give consent as a pet cat. Then she runs into a talking psychic type, and it just gets worse, because now it's confirmed that they do have human cognition and are capable of talking and understanding, it's just that no one, including the pokephiles fucking them, cares. She goes on to feed him pidgey soup.
Yeah.
*Today's question, if you are able to ponder it: do you think members of the North American Man/Boy Love Association think it's wrong, sick and immoral for men to have sex with underage girls?
Oh, and a bonus review from Mightyena26:
Oh, wow, that's a really good question. I'll be awake half the night because
of this. LOL. The writing style wasn't the greatest, but I still enjoyed
reading it because of the interesting question. Pokemon names should always be
capatalized, just so you know. Such as Eevee, Vaporeon, Jolteon, Flareon,
Espeon, Umbreon, Leafeon, and Glaceon. It was okay, not the greatest thing
I've ever read. But the question is just mind-bogging.
