Page Summary
ember-reignited.livejournal.com - (no subject)
farla.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ember-reignited.livejournal.com - (no subject)
farla.livejournal.com - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - Wow, that guy's a total douchebag.
farla.livejournal.com - Re: Wow, that guy's a total douchebag.
learntwocook.livejournal.com - (no subject)
farla.livejournal.com - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - Re: Wow, that guy's a total douchebag.
farla.livejournal.com - Re: Wow, that guy's a total douchebag.
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-10-24 10:23 pm (UTC)I really like Vanny's writing actually so this is kind of disappointing.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-24 10:51 pm (UTC)(They're pawns because otherwise they couldn't promote to queen! Why would you even make a distinction between the two groups, WHAT IS THE POINT THEY'RE ALL CHESS PEOPLE. And if there is canon backing for the other one, explain it! That's how it's supposed to work, you have REASONS for thinking things!)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-24 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-24 11:54 pm (UTC)Wow, that guy's a total douchebag.
Date: 2011-10-25 08:33 pm (UTC)Re: Wow, that guy's a total douchebag.
Date: 2011-10-25 08:37 pm (UTC)Usually people will calm down eventually.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-26 01:49 am (UTC)Things that are not appropriate criticisms:
-The way an author talks outside the fic (i.e. "bromance is an obnoxious word"). That's none of your business. Period.
-Straight up insults. "Ugh" is not remotely constructive. "This is idiotic" is not constructive either.
I'm curious as to what you think of this, though.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-26 06:10 am (UTC)I didn't say "Ugh, this is idiotic." Both were next to something that was deserving of being referred to with ugh and idiotic respectively, and so both were constructive. Also, the latter was referring to actions the characters were undertaking. It's not like I'd hesitate to just call the author an idiot if that's what I wanted to do.
They accurately reflect how much I objected to the author's terrible decisions.
Re: Wow, that guy's a total douchebag.
Date: 2011-10-26 05:53 pm (UTC)Re: Wow, that guy's a total douchebag.
Date: 2011-10-26 09:52 pm (UTC)