It's not as though there's any Rapture canon to be based on, loosely or otherwise. A strictly Biblical apocalypse would have no Rapture at all.
Ah, but L&J go the extra mile! They read the bible and found out what it does mention won't happen, and then wrote the Rapture based on that.
*facepalm* Oh man. You can't make this stuff up.
Now you know why they're such big fans of line by line numbering. If, God forbid, you told someone to read the page, or even just the paragraph in question, they couldn't possibly miss the sentence, since it's the first line of the paragraph. It takes a lot of effort to miss it. You have to make sure you're only talking about lines 51-57, preferably as a quotation printed in a pamphlet or something so there's no chance of someone accidentally reading the actual bible.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 04:28 am (UTC)Ah, but L&J go the extra mile! They read the bible and found out what it does mention won't happen, and then wrote the Rapture based on that.
*facepalm* Oh man. You can't make this stuff up.
Now you know why they're such big fans of line by line numbering. If, God forbid, you told someone to read the page, or even just the paragraph in question, they couldn't possibly miss the sentence, since it's the first line of the paragraph. It takes a lot of effort to miss it. You have to make sure you're only talking about lines 51-57, preferably as a quotation printed in a pamphlet or something so there's no chance of someone accidentally reading the actual bible.