(The answer of course is that I was intentionally abusing grammar to highlight the break in reality. Looking back, I'm not entirely sure it was the best idea in the world, but you'd have to be willfully obtuse not to see what I was going for. Actually, capitalizing "Sun" in the next paragraph is much more suspect; I think that was a genuine mistake.)
Oh my god it is the trainwreak that keeps wreaking. I guess he's going for everyone who posted in the thread except me?
Of course this is continuing to make no sense - if you review people who are defending mean reviews as something you shouldn't scream about, and they don't scream at it for you, what are you proving?
He has yet to tackle me. Then again, he probably has no clue whether I am an earnest pseudoscientist or not. Or maybe he just hasn't gotten around to insulting me.
(Hi by the way. I too have been reading through your Hunger Games reviews. Thanks for being comprehensive enough that I don't feel the need to obtain an actual copy in order to follow along.)
Well, if you want to try again to get him to do some proper pseudoscience, get him to review people I haven't already done. My extensive learnings on the matter are that people always take a review less badly if they've gotten a harsher review before. And anyway, some concrit, even stuff as weak as his, is still a step up for the category.
(I'm glad! I've been trying to keep things as clear as possible.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 04:13 pm (UTC)(The answer of course is that I was intentionally abusing grammar to highlight the break in reality. Looking back, I'm not entirely sure it was the best idea in the world, but you'd have to be willfully obtuse not to see what I was going for. Actually, capitalizing "Sun" in the next paragraph is much more suspect; I think that was a genuine mistake.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 04:19 pm (UTC)Of course this is continuing to make no sense - if you review people who are defending mean reviews as something you shouldn't scream about, and they don't scream at it for you, what are you proving?
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 01:37 am (UTC)(Hi by the way. I too have been reading through your Hunger Games reviews. Thanks for being comprehensive enough that I don't feel the need to obtain an actual copy in order to follow along.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 02:13 am (UTC)Well, if you want to try again to get him to do some proper pseudoscience, get him to review people I haven't already done. My extensive learnings on the matter are that people always take a review less badly if they've gotten a harsher review before. And anyway, some concrit, even stuff as weak as his, is still a step up for the category.
(I'm glad! I've been trying to keep things as clear as possible.)