Page Summary
wintersheir - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - Experiment
- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
masu-trout.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ember-reignited.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flyhighgemini.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flyhighgemini.livejournal.com - (no subject)
foxyuna.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 03:32 am (UTC)Experiment
Date: 2011-05-30 05:05 am (UTC)Re: Experiment
Date: 2011-05-30 05:29 am (UTC)Someone should keep demanding he review me, though. His main argument is about giving nicely worded reviews no matter what the content - proving he's able to do that is far more relevant than proving if you kiss ass enough people won't yell at you, and also it's a lot funnier. If he really thinks I should always be sugar and spice, he needs to do it himself.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 11:00 am (UTC)What.
I know this is a completely weird to fixate on but the least the guy he can do is make his insults a little personal.
Say, "too busy sniffing chicken butts" or "getting off to that to that spider chick from that webcomic". It only takes three seconds to figure out some! Yaoi fangirl seems such a generic thing to just throw around.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 05:33 pm (UTC)Someone should keep demanding he review me, though. His main argument is about giving nicely worded reviews no matter what the content - proving he's able to do that is far more relevant than proving if you kiss ass enough people won't yell at you, and also it's a lot funnier. If he really thinks I should always be sugar and spice, he needs to do it himself.
Or you could just tell him that in the thread yourself, I suppose...
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 05:45 pm (UTC)But if you're going over there ask him how he'd reword the flame he left on Inheritors! I just want to see him squirm.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 03:56 pm (UTC)I think this is my favorite part of the whole thing, because it's just so bizarrely out there. I honestly can't tell if he chose "Red x Ash" specifically because he thought the fact that it was weird intercontinuity selfcest fanart would make his incredible diss that much more insulting, or if he really hasn't ever looked at slash in his life and actually doesn't know that that's not really a common pairing.
And also, I think he really underestimates your ability to multitask.
Hi, by the way. You don't really know me, but I've been loving your Hunger Games reviews.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 04:05 pm (UTC)And I know, it's all so weird, like he's running his insults through some sort of translation filter. I thought Gary/Ash was the main oldschool pairing! Also, generally written porn not visual. (Though he probably means the two staring into each other's eyes because homosexuality is automatically XXX rated.) Also also, how is "I accuses you of looking at teh yaois" a big deal in the first place? That's what really boggles me.
And also, I think he really underestimates your ability to multitask.
I actually am really good at typing with one hand. Just not for that reason.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 04:38 pm (UTC)I actually googled the pairing, just out of curiosity. There about five pictures total that even featured both of them, and out of that there was exactly one that could be seen as romantic. (On the other hand, though,there was also one featuring Red's pikachu brutally mauling Ash's pikachu. So that was...interesting.)
I'm just going to go with "he doesn't know or care what he's talking about" and leave it at that.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 04:13 pm (UTC)(The answer of course is that I was intentionally abusing grammar to highlight the break in reality. Looking back, I'm not entirely sure it was the best idea in the world, but you'd have to be willfully obtuse not to see what I was going for. Actually, capitalizing "Sun" in the next paragraph is much more suspect; I think that was a genuine mistake.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 04:19 pm (UTC)Of course this is continuing to make no sense - if you review people who are defending mean reviews as something you shouldn't scream about, and they don't scream at it for you, what are you proving?
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 01:37 am (UTC)(Hi by the way. I too have been reading through your Hunger Games reviews. Thanks for being comprehensive enough that I don't feel the need to obtain an actual copy in order to follow along.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 02:13 am (UTC)Well, if you want to try again to get him to do some proper pseudoscience, get him to review people I haven't already done. My extensive learnings on the matter are that people always take a review less badly if they've gotten a harsher review before. And anyway, some concrit, even stuff as weak as his, is still a step up for the category.
(I'm glad! I've been trying to keep things as clear as possible.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 07:54 pm (UTC)Calling the archetypical uke a girl is insulting to girls everywhere.
I phrase it as a joke, but I'm actually completely serious. Even if you're not specifically talking about the uke, "chick with a dick!" is not a good criticism because a lot of "chicks" don't act stereotypically feminine and some men do. You're better off pointing out why it's OOC or implausible for that particular male character, if that's the issue.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 08:03 pm (UTC)Damn I want to get my critique on now >>
no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-30 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-20 04:52 am (UTC)I am so curious on what his reaction to you claiming him as a hatefriend o_o
no subject
Date: 2012-02-20 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-20 04:57 am (UTC)Say, what inspired you to be a reviewer?
no subject
Date: 2012-02-20 05:01 am (UTC)The current crusader type stuff is because I'm also stubborn.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-20 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-20 06:07 am (UTC)