:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Jan. 28th, 2011 10:47 amI think more people would be turned off by the fact that she constantly reviews others' stories for no other reason than to enforce her own OPINIONS as if they were fact [[WallBanger(i.e. insulting people for capitalizing the names of Pokemon)]], flaming anyone who even slightly disagrees with her (quite literally, she often tells people who disagree with her that she wants to see them burn), and just trolling in general. And she does this on a LOT of fics. Even on quality stories. This tends to backfire, as most reviews on her own stories tend to be retaliatory flames. It's like what would happen if Uwe Boll finally put out a good movie. It could be the best movie ever, but he's put out so much crap, and been so arrogant towards pretty much everyone over the years, that no one would actually care how good it was. She's not a bad author, but she IS a bad person, and that tends to turn people off even more than the quality of the work.
Oh, TvTropes rec page, never stop being so awesomely hilarious.
(Also, I'd like to point to this as Exhibit #45678 of why I tune out people saying I should be nicer. Telling people not to capitalize pokemon is insulting them!)
Oh, TvTropes rec page, never stop being so awesomely hilarious.
(Also, I'd like to point to this as Exhibit #45678 of why I tune out people saying I should be nicer. Telling people not to capitalize pokemon is insulting them!)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 04:45 pm (UTC)So okay, actually it's a terrible metaphor. And also inaccurate because most of the reviews I get aren't flames in the first place. But the important part is they admitted I'm totally awesome and all criticism ever on my fics is just because people are
jealousmad at me.no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:10 am (UTC)In shonen, purity is connected to adversity. The one who deserves a given thing is the one that struggles hardest for it, and heroic actions are usually a matter of going above and beyond what's necessary at the cost of your own body.
And then in Pokemon, you've got the same dynamic only it separates the person making the decisions/getting the rewards from the person doing the work. A shonen hero letting someone beat the crap out of them and refusing to give up is noble. A character ordering the shonen hero to get the crap beaten out of them is an asshole. A major part of shonen tropes is the character is so driven they're willing to voluntarily do things no one could ever ask of them.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:22 am (UTC)Actually the other one where they make a big deal over Gary getting smacked around by Mewtwo was similarly off - what, if Gary's pokemon were all unconscious but he was still standing it'd have been okay? It's suddenly wrong now that a human was hurt?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:55 am (UTC)And in a show that actually had character development, you'd have Ash learn that sometimes it's okay to forfeit if your pokemon are getting the shit beaten out of them, and otherwise being more concerned about winning with the minimum damage done to them.
(In a fanfic, which is less on the rails, I'd really like to see things where trainers start out being ordinary trainers, and realize it's fucked up around the point they're actually involved in something important, instead of badges, so they have a goal that isn't just about them. Like, if Ash's gym battle had led into an epic struggle against Team Rocket, instead of the Indigo Plateau fights.)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 07:16 am (UTC)And then the Championships happen, and Ash loses, and it's... not actually a big deal. And that's when ten-year-old me realizes what little overarching plot there is she is not invested in at all, just as the cast heads off to a new location that isn't in the games so there isn't even the excitement of seeing familiar game settings brought to life to look forward to. So yeah that was the point I decided the ridiculous Mary Sue story in my head was way more entertaining than anything the show had to offer, and that the time I spent watching it would be put to much better use daydreaming.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 07:45 am (UTC)Instead Ash is just "huh so Team Rocket controls the eighth gym...WELP THAT WAS MY LAST BADGE, OFF TO THE POKELYPICS!"
...to my shame I didn't realize it. I kept being strung along. Orange Islands! It's a new area that must be important right? Maybe it'll be part of the new games or something...no, but okay, now there's the GS ball! That's got to be import...or I guess it could not...
I forget how far I got into Johto. Around when Ash had replaced most of his team and the realization that we were on a permanent plot treadmill, because there wasn't even the illusion he was progressing as a trainer any longer.
And the worst part about it is the show really did seem like it originally was meant to have a plot arc. Early episode Ash actually learns from various events and slowly becomes more competent, even if it is at a snail's pace. And he hits various bits of game plot, like the SS Anne. And then at some point it all stops, and all the episodes become interchangeable.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 08:10 pm (UTC)After seeing it many years after the first movie and Johto, I think it would have been a great ending to the franchise and the games could just continue, but apparently they wanted to rake in more cash.
Once again, artistic finesse loses out to money.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 08:15 pm (UTC)I really wish they'd reset the franchise with a new character for each region, though.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 07:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 07:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-28 11:16 pm (UTC)Also, no they aren't (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SlidingScaleOfGenderInequality).
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:37 am (UTC)Then they go on to admit my writing is good. Even people who hate me think my writing is good! People who like me might be lying to spare my feelings, but people who hate me? I think not.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:46 am (UTC)I mean, JoJo's Bizarre Adventure Part 6 breaks the series' tradition of male protagonists with Joelyne. Seriously? There's an entire damn "tradition" of male protagonists but they eventually get around to including a girl so it's gender equal? And FMA, really? Horribly imbalanced casts are considered equal if they're mostly male, while anything with more women is considered unbalanced.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 01:56 am (UTC)Should I call them out on that? I have an account and I can talk on the discussion page if necessary.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:28 pm (UTC)Still, though, surely there's *something* I could do?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:02 pm (UTC)Or perhaps you could once NaRe is over? I'm sure you're better at arguing than I am...
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 08:04 pm (UTC)And even if you could get everything established perfectly, it'd still degrade into wank and stupidity. Every example in the lower numbers of outright sexism that's less than FATAL levels would either get argued to death by its fans or the level itself would get edited until it was described as neutral. And I don't think there's any way to explain that the "female characters get portrayed as more competent than male ones" examples isn't actually sexist against men so much as sexist against everyone, and - yeah there's just no way to get it to work. The only working system would be to cut treatment and just do it by ratio because that's objective enough you could keep the stupidity under control.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 05:44 pm (UTC)(I think I was in Small Name Big Ego before the page was nuked, probably over the reviews, but I never saw it.)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:55 pm (UTC)I mean, so's my forum, but if you're posting on my forum it should be obvious I'll show up and call you an idiot, while I normally just leave other places to their own devices.
John
Date: 2017-07-08 01:19 pm (UTC)